Why the study?
Does oral atropine compared to i.v. glycopyrrolate increase the risk for acid aspiration in healthy children undergoing adenoidectomy?
Does oral atropine compared to i.v. glycopyrrolate increase the risk for acid aspiration in healthy children undergoing adenoidectomy?
Oral atropine premedication increases gastric volume and acidity compared to i.v. glycopyrrolate, enhancing the risk of acid aspiration in children.
Supports preferring i.v. glycopyrrolate over oral atropine for pediatric premedication; confirms higher aspiration risk with oral atropine.
Two modes of administration of an anticholinergic drug were compared in 58 healthy children undergoing adenoidectomy. The study was double-blind and randomized. All children were premedicated with oral midazolam 0.5 mg/kg. Twenty-nine children received oral atropine 0.03 mg/kg (Group A) and the rest were given i.v. glycopyrrolate 0.005 mg/kg at the induction of anaesthesia (Group G). In Group A, of 29 children, the stomach was empty in 2, pH was less than 2.5 in 23, the gastric volume was greater than 0.4 ml/kg in 19, and both these risk factors were present in 17 children. The same figures in Group G were 5 (NS), 14 (P less than 0.05), 10 (P less than 0.05) and 9 (P less than 0.05) children, respectively. The antisialagogue effect was similar in both groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Randell et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: