Why the study?
Does the use of third-generation oral contraceptives reduce the risk of myocardial infarction in women aged 16-44 compared to first- or second-generation oral contraceptives?
Does the use of third-generation oral contraceptives reduce the risk of myocardial infarction in women aged 16-44 compared to first- or second-generation oral contraceptives?
Third-generation oral contraceptives are associated with a significantly lower risk of myocardial infarction compared to second-generation pills in women aged 16-44.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Third-generation OCs were associated with lower MI odds than second-generation; leaves open effects on prescribing pending prospective confirmation.
Reported in this letter are the final results of a transnational case-control study on oral contraceptives (OCs) and myocardial infarction. 182 women 16-44 years of age with myocardial infarction were recruited to the study at 16 European centers in 1993-96; 635 hospital and community-based healthy women matched by age group and site served as controls. Documented in linear trend analysis was a clear decrease in risk from first to third generation OCs. The odds ratios (ORs) were 4.66 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-14.33) for women who used first-generation OCs 2.99 (95% CI 1.51-5.91) for second-generation OCs and 0.85 (95% CI 0.30-2.39) for third-generation pills. The OR for current use of third-generation OCs compared with current use of second-generation pills was 0.28 (95% CI 0.09-0.87). Finally the OR for the risk of myocardial infarction was 7.2 (95% CI 4.6-11.4) when current smoking was adjusted for OC use. The expected reduction in deaths from myocardial infarction associated with third-generation OCs should offset any excess deaths associated with venous thromboembolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lewis et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: