Why the study?
Hydrophilic lubricious coatings on catheters can cause iatrogenic complications when particles detach and float freely in the bloodstream.
Does a PEG-functionalized hyaluronic acid coating improve lubrication and preserve endothelial integrity in an ex vivo cardiovascular catheter model?
Does a PEG-functionalized hyaluronic acid coating improve lubrication and preserve endothelial integrity in an ex vivo cardiovascular catheter model?
A novel PEG-functionalized hyaluronic acid coating for cardiovascular catheters provides excellent lubrication and preserves endothelial integrity in an ex vivo model.
May reduce embolization risk from coating debris during catheterization; hypothesis-generating pending in vivo validation.
Catheterization is a common medical operation for cardiovascular disease diagnosis and treatment, where low friction is attained through hydrophilic lubricious coatings. But these coatings can cause iatrogenic complications when particles become lose and float freely in the blood stream. Here we present an ultra-thin coating based on polyethylene glycol (PEG) functionalized hyaluronic acid (HA). The mussel-inspired biopolymer hyaluronic acid was first conjugated to dopamine (DN) to get HADN and then poly (ethylene glycol) bis (3-amino-propyl) terminated (PBA) was used to functionalize the HADN with PEG. The reciprocating sliding ball-on-flat ex vivo model based on PU ball and porcine aorta was used to evaluate the lubrication performance and the results suggest coating of HADN with best lubrication enhancement. After 40 min friction test, the surface of aorta remained intact for HADN-PBA coated PU as compared to HADN coating and positive control (sliding against bare PU). The amount of glycocalyx, number of endothelial nuclei and intima surface of aorta for coated PU were similar to negative control (without rubbing). Besides lubrication, the high biocompatibility suggests the coating of HADN-PBA is safe and lubrication benefits to the cardiovascular catheter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wan et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: