Why the study?
Does thoracic endovascular aortic repair improve outcomes compared to surgery in patients with complicated acute type B aortic dissection?
Does thoracic endovascular aortic repair improve outcomes compared to surgery in patients with complicated acute type B aortic dissection?
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is a promising and favorable alternative to surgery for complicated acute type B aortic dissection, though long-term durability remains to be established.
TEVAR may be a viable alternative to surgery for complicated acute type B aortic dissection in experienced centers; leaves open long-term durability and RCT confirmation.
The management of patients with complicated acute type B aortic dissection is challenging. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has shown promising results in small series; however, using nonstandard definitions and improper inclusion criteria confounds the published results. This article reviews the techniques and outcome of patients who underwent endovascular treatment for complicated acute type B aortic dissection in North America. Primary stent grafting for treatment of complicated acute type B aortic dissection compares favorably with the surgical outcome. Thoracic aortic endovascular repair can be offered with a relatively low postoperative morbidity and mortality in experienced hands. It also appears to have a favorable outcome in mid-term follow-up. Longevity of the repair and durability of the stent grafts in the thoracic aorta are yet to be established.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khoynezhad et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: