Why the study?
Does an improved protocol of cardiac anesthesia, CPB, and cardioplegia improve survival in small-breed dogs undergoing mitral valve plasty with >90 minutes of aortic cross clamp time?
Does an improved protocol of cardiac anesthesia, CPB, and cardioplegia improve survival in small-breed dogs undergoing mitral valve plasty with >90 minutes of aortic cross clamp time?
Improvements in cardiac anesthesia, CPB, and cardioplegia enable a 70% survival-to-discharge rate for small dogs undergoing mitral valve plasty with prolonged aortic cross-clamp times (>90 minutes).
Demonstrates feasibility of prolonged cross-clamp times in veterinary mitral valve repair; leaves open whether these cardiop.
No previous reports have described cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) techniques involving long aortic cross clamp (ACC) times in small-breed dogs. We previously described open heart surgery under deep hypothermic CPB in small and toy dogs with an approximate ACC time limit of 1 hour, given the low success rate beyond 90 minutes of ACC time. Herein, we describe improvements in cardiac anesthesia, CPB, and cardioplegia that led to a high success rate of open heart surgery with a long ACC time in small dogs. Ten small-breed dogs with severe mitral regurgitation were subjected to mitral valve plasty that necessitated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) beyond 90 minutes of ACC time. In the present study, all dogs survived surgery; 7 survived to discharge. In other words, we achieved a high success rate of 70% with mitral valve plasty beyond 90 minutes of ACC time (mean, 105.1 minutes: range, 90-117 minutes). For small dogs, successful open heart surgery with a long ACC time may require cardiac balanced anesthesia, CPB with increased drainage and, importantly, thorough cardioplegia without hemodilution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mihara et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: