BACKGROUND: Achieving effective soft tissue graft-tibial tunnel fixation remains problematic. HYPOTHESIS: No differences would exist for tibialis anterior graft-tibial tunnel fixation when comparing the RetroScrew System (20-mm retrograde screw, 17-mm antegrade screw), the 35-mm tapered Delta Screw (manual tensioning), and the 35-mm BioScrew XtraLok (applied using an instrumented tensioner). STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Porcine tibiae (apparent bone mineral density, 1.3 g/cm(2)) and human tendon allografts were divided into 3 matched groups of 6 specimens each before cyclic (500 cycles, 50-250 N, 1 Hz) and load-to-failure (20 mm/min) tests. RESULTS: The BioScrew XtraLok (210.9 +/- 54.9 N/mm) and the 35-mm Delta Screw (224.3 +/- 43.7 N/mm) displayed superior stiffness to the RetroScrew System (114.1 +/- 23.3 N/mm) (P = .0004) during cyclic testing. The BioScrew XtraLok (1.0 +/- 0.2 mm) and the Delta Screw (0.9 +/- 0.2 mm) also displayed less displacement during cyclic testing than the RetroScrew System (1.8 +/- 0.5 mm) (P = .001). During load-to-failure testing, the BioScrew XtraLok withstood greater loads (1436.3 +/- 331.3 N) (P = .001) and displayed greater stiffness (323.6 +/- 56.8 N/mm) (P = .002) than the 35-mm Delta Screw (load, 1042.2 +/- 214.4 N; stiffness, 257.2 +/- 22.2 N/mm) and the RetroScrew System (load, 778.7 +/- 177.5 N; stiffness, 204.4 +/- 52.9 N/mm). CONCLUSION: The BioScrew XtraLok with instrumented tensioning displayed superior fixation to the RetroScrew System and the 35-mm Delta Screw applied with manual tensioning. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The BioScrew XtraLok may provide superior soft tissue graft-tibial tunnel fixation. Further in vitro studies using human tissue and in vivo clinical studies are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: