Why the study?
The utility of the modified 5 factor frailty index in predicting postoperative patient-reported outcomes and return to activities remains understudied.
Is higher frailty (measured by mFI-5) associated with worse patient-reported outcomes and decreased return to activities after 1 or 2 level MI-TLIF?
Is higher frailty (measured by mFI-5) associated with worse patient-reported outcomes and decreased return to activities after 1 or 2 level MI-TLIF?
Higher frailty measured by the mFI-5 index is associated with worse postoperative patient-reported outcomes and lower fusion rates following 1 or 2 level MI-TLIF.
High mFI-5 may flag poorer recovery risk after MI-TLIF; leaves open whether frailty optimization improves PROMs or activity return.
Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective Frailty is defined as a state of minimal “physiologic reserve.” The modified 5 factor frailty index (mFI-5) is a recently proposed metric for assessing frailty and has been previously studied as a predictor of morbidity and mortality. However, its utility in predicting postoperative patient reported outcomes (PROMs) and return to activities remains understudied. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing 1 or 2 level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion queried from a prospectively maintained multi-surgeon registry. Comorbidities including hypertension, congestive heart failure, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and functional status were utilized to calculate the mFI-5. Patients were separated into 3 cohorts, “non-frail,” “moderately frail” or “severely frail” based on their mFI-5. Patient outcomes were compared between the cohorts. Results 392 patients were included of which 227 patients were non-frail, 134 were moderately frail, and 31 were severely frail. Frail patients had longer operative time ( P = 0.002), greater estimated blood loss ( P = 0.038). Despite similar preoperative PROMs, at a longer term follow up, frail patients also had worse PROM scores for ODI ( P = 0.009), VAS-back ( P = 0.028), and VAS-leg ( P = 0.004). Frail patients had worse preoperative ( P = 0.017) and postoperative ( P < 0.001) SF-12 PCS. At 1-year, frail patients had lower rates of fusion ( P = 0.002). Frail patients also demonstrated lower rates of returning to work ( P = 0.018), returning to driving ( P = 0.027), and discontinuation of narcotics ( P = 0.004). Conclusion Frail patients as measured by the mFI-5 index demonstrated worse postoperative outcomes following 1 or 2 level MI-TLIF. Careful patient selection and preoperative optimization may be especially important in frail patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Subramanian et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: