Why the study?
Immature Platelet Fraction (IPF) may have diagnostic value in ACS, but its diagnostic utility and ability to differentiate between ACS subtypes needed comprehensive summarization.
Does Immature Platelet Fraction (IPF) level differentiate between patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), stable angina, and healthy controls?
Does Immature Platelet Fraction (IPF) level differentiate between patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), stable angina, and healthy controls?
Immature Platelet Fraction (IPF) is significantly elevated in ACS compared to stable angina and healthy controls, and may help differentiate between ACS subtypes.
IPF may aid early ACS diagnosis and subtype differentiation; supports prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Introduction: Immature Platelet Fraction (IPF) is a measure of the proportion of reticulated platelets (RPs) to all platelets in circulation. IPF may have both prognostic and diagnostic values in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). This study aims to comprehensively summarize the diagnostic utility of IPF levels in patients with ACS, specifically focusing on its ability to differentiate between different subtypes of ACS. Methods: 2024, to identify relevant studies. The random-effect model, employing inverse variance for mean differences (MD) and Mantel-Haenszel methods for odds ratios (OR) were utilized to combine the data. Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) appraisal tool was employed to assess the quality of included studies. Results: Our systematic review contains 15 articles with a total sample size of 2,030 ACS patients. Pooled analysis revealed significant differences in IPF levels of ACS patients compared to healthy controls (MD (95%CI): 2.85 (0.86, 4.85), P-value = 0.004) and stable angina patients (MD (95%CI): 0.58 (0.23, 0.92), P-value < 0.001). Subgroup comparisons within ACS patients demonstrated higher IPF levels in myocardial infarction (MI) vs. unstable angina (UA) (MD (95%CI): 1.81 (0.41, 3.22), P-value = 0.01), ST elevation MI (STEMI) vs. non-ST elevation (NSTEMI) ACS (MD (95%CI): 0.74 (0.31, 1.17), P-value < 0.001), and NSTEMI vs. UA (MD (95% CI): 1.07 (0.24, 1.90), P-value = 0.01). Conclusion: IPF levels could increase in patients with ACS, particularly during the acute phase of STEMI. This suggests that IPF may be a useful biomarker for early diagnosis of ACS. Additionally, IPF levels may help differentiate between ACS subtypes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Afshar et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: