Why the study?
Cirrhosis can cause prolonged QTc intervals in a subset of patients, but data on its diurnal variation are sparse.
Does non-alcoholic cirrhosis alter the diurnal variation of QTc interval compared to healthy controls?
Does non-alcoholic cirrhosis alter the diurnal variation of QTc interval compared to healthy controls?
Patients with non-alcoholic cirrhosis exhibit prolonged QTc intervals and altered diurnal variation compared to healthy individuals.
Prolonged QTc with altered diurnal variation in cirrhosis may signal arrhythmic risk; leaves open whether patterns predict outcomes in prospective cohorts.
Background: Cirrhosis could lead to a long corrected QT (QTc) interval in a subgroup of patients, but there are spare data on its diurnal variation. Objectives: The present study aimed to determine the diurnal variation of QTc interval and its relationship to heart rate and blood pressure variation during 24-hour Holter-monitoring in non-alcoholic cirrhosis in comparison with the healthy controls. Methods: The study population comprised 15 patients with non-alcoholic cirrhosis and 15 healthy subjects, undergoing 24-hour electrocardiogram (ECG), heart rate, and blood pressure monitoring. The mean QT interval, mean QTc, maximum and minimum QT, QT dispersion (QT disp), heart rate, and mean arterial blood pressure were measured for each person for 24 hours. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) was performed by FibroScan® 502 machine (EchoSense, Paris, France, 5 MHz). The results were demonstrated as percentages and mean ± SD. P value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Mean QTc was significantly higher in cirrhosis (438 ms) than healthy controls (401.7 ms) (P = 0.03). The mean heart rate was significantly different in cirrhotic patients (79.6 ± 2.9/bpm) compared to healthy controls (72.47 ± 2.0/bpm) (P = 0.05). Conclusions: In this study, QTc was prolonged and increased with the severity of cirrhosis, and its diurnal variation in cirrhosis was different from healthy subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amiriani et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: