Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reaction of [(DMSC)Ti{1,2,4-(Me 3 Si) 3 C 6 H 3 }] ( 1 ) with 1 equiv of bipyridine (bpy) or 4,4‘-dimethyl-2,2‘-dipyridyl (dmbpy) and a slight excess of RC⋮CH quantitatively produced [(DMSC)Ti(η 2 -RC⋮CH)(L 2 )] (L 2 = bpy or dmbpy) ( 5 − 16 ). (DMSC)TiPh 2 ( 17 ) reacted with ≥2 equiv of bpy or dmbpy to give (DMSC)Ti(bpy) 2 ( 18 ) and (DMSC)Ti(dmbpy) 2 ( 19 ), respectively. Both 1 H and 13 C NMR data, as well as X-ray crystallography in the case of [(DMSC)Ti(η 2 -HC⋮CBu t )(bpy)] ( 7 ), support exo-orientation of the alkyne's non-H substituent in 5 − 16 . Reaction of [(DMSC)Ti{1,2,4-(Me 3 Si) 3 C 6 H 3 }] ( 1 ) with a mixture of RC⋮CH and R 2 CO did not give the expected 5-oxa-1-titana-2-cyclopentene products but instead produced 2,7-dioxa-1-titana-4-cycloheptenes ( 20 − 25 ). The latter result may be understood in terms of the unique directing influence of the DMSC ligand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ozerov et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: