Key result
Ultrasound reliably estimates abdominal fat with inter- and intraobserver variation consistently below ~10%.
Why the study?
Ultrasonography is an accessible method for assessing abdominal fat distribution, but few details about its reproducibility have been published in populations at high risk of type 2 diabetes.
Does ultrasonography provide reproducible estimates of abdominal fat distribution in patients at high risk of type 2 diabetes?
Observational (n=86)
Does ultrasonography provide reproducible estimates of abdominal fat distribution in patients at high risk of type 2 diabetes?
Ultrasonography is a reproducible method for assessing visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat by clinical researchers, supporting its use in epidemiological studies.
Background:Visceral fat plays an important role in the development of metabolic disease independently of the effect of overall abdominal fat. Ultrasonography is an accessible method of accurately assessing abdominal fat distribution in epidemiological studies, but few details about the reproducibility of this method have been published.Objective:The aim of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of ultrasonography in the assessment of abdominal fat distribution in a population at high risk of type 2 diabetes.Design and Methods:Ultrasonography was used to estimate visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat. Intra- and interobserver variation, short-term variation and variation between estimates in the fasting and non-fasting state were examined in three samples of 30, 33 and 23 participants from the ADDITION-PRO study. A variance components model was used to calculate intra- and interobserver variation, and Bland–Altman plots were drawn for all three substudies.Results:Coefficients of variation for intra- and interobserver variation were in the range 3.4–6.1%, except for interobserver variation for subcutaneous fat (9.5%). Short-term variation over a median of 35 days had a coefficient of variation of 15%. The effect of a meal was primarily on the visceral estimates and did not extend beyond the first postprandial hour. Non-fasting visceral estimates were larger than fasting estimates.Conclusion:Both visceral and subcutaneous fat can be estimated with ultrasonography with adequate intra- and interobserver reproducibility by clinical researchers with limited training, making it a feasible method of assessing abdominal fat distribution in epidemiological studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Philipsen et al. (2013) conducted an observational in high risk of type 2 diabetes (n=86). Ultrasonography was evaluated on Intra- and interobserver variation, and short-term variation. Ultrasonography for estimating abdominal fat demonstrated adequate reproducibility, with intra- and interobserver coefficients of variation ranging from 3.4% to 9.5%, and short-term variation of 15%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: