Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High temperature Aurivillius piezoelectrics, (Li, Ln)(0.06)(Na, Bi)(0.44)Bi(2)Nb(2)O(9) (NBN-LiLn), with Li and Ln (Ce, Nd, La and Y) co-substitution at the A site, were prepared using a solid-state reaction process. Taking cation disordering between A site and the (Bi(2)O(2))(2+) layers into consideration, the crystal structure of (Li, Nd)(0.06)(Na, Bi)(0.44)Bi(2)Nb(2)O(9) (NBN-LiNd) was refined by using the Rietveld method with powder X-ray diffraction, which was confirmed to be a two-layer Aurivillius oxide with an orthorhombic space group, A2(1)am [a = 5.48666(9) Å, b = 5.46046(8) Å, c = 24.9122(4) Å and Z = 4], at room temperature. LiNd substitution induced a decrease in cation disorder and an increase in orthorhombic distortion. The ferroelectric to paraelectric phase transition temperature (T(c)) of the NBN-LiLn (Ln = Ce, Nd, La and Y) ceramics ranged from 751 to 842 °C and the T(c) increased as the radii of the Ln(3+) (Ce(3+), Nd(3+), La(3+) and Y(3+)) was decreased. The NBN-LiCe and NBN-LiNd had a d(33) of 31 and 29 pC N(-1), respectively, which is much higher than the reported d(33) values of other Aurivillius ceramics with a high T(c) (T(c) > 650 °C, d(33) < 20 pC N(-1)). With increasing annealing temperature, a significant degradation in d(33) was observed for NBN-LiCe, while no drop in d(33) was observed up to 650 °C for NBN-LiNd. The inhomogeneous domain structures determined the dissimilar piezoelectric behaviors of NBN-LiCe and NBN-LiNd.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Long et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: