Why the study?
Does coherent hemodynamics spectroscopy detect differences in cerebral microcirculation between hemodialysis patients and healthy controls?
Does coherent hemodynamics spectroscopy detect differences in cerebral microcirculation between hemodialysis patients and healthy controls?
Coherent hemodynamics spectroscopy is a feasible clinical tool that detects significantly prolonged cerebral microvascular blood transit times in hemodialysis patients compared to healthy controls.
Supports feasibility of coherent hemodynamics spectroscopy in hemodialysis; leaves open clinical utility pending prospective studies.
We present a pilot clinical application of coherent hemodynamics spectroscopy (CHS), a technique to investigate cerebral hemodynamics at the microcirculatory level. CHS relies on frequency-resolved measurements of induced cerebral hemodynamic oscillations that are measured with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and analyzed with a hemodynamic model. We have used cyclic inflation (200 mmHg) and deflation of a pneumatic cuff placed around the subject's thigh at seven frequencies in the range of 0.03 to 0.17 Hz to generate CHS spectra and to obtain a set of physiological parameters that include the blood transit times in the cerebral microcirculation, the cutoff frequency for cerebral autoregulation, and blood volume ratios across the three different compartments. We have investigated five hemodialysis patients, during the hemodialysis procedure, and six healthy subjects. We have found that the blood transit time in the cerebral microcirculation is significantly longer in hemodialysis patients with respect to healthy subjects. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of autoregulation efficiency and blood volume ratios. The demonstration of the applicability of CHS in a clinical setting and its sensitivity to the highly important cerebral microcirculation may open up new opportunities for NIRS applications in research and in medical diagnostics and monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pierro et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: