Why the study?
NASH is linked to increased cardiovascular risk independent of metabolic syndrome factors, but the intermediary factors between NASH and cardiovascular disease remain unknown.
In a hypertensive rat model, the presence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis significantly aggravates cardiovascular risk by exacerbating arteriosclerosis and myocardial ischemia induced by nitric oxide synthase inhibition.
NASH-linked cardiac fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction in this rat model; hypothesis-generating for human risk but should not yet change practice.
Summary Non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is linked to increased cardiovascular risk, independent of the broad spectrum of metabolic syndrome risk factors. Stroke‐prone (SP) spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP5/Dmcr) fed a high‐fat and high‐cholesterol (HFC) diet developed hepatic lesions similar to those in human NASH pathology. These rats simultaneously developed lipid deposits in the mesenteric arteries, cardiac fibrosis, endothelial dysfunction and left ventricle (LV) diastolic dysfunction. However, the intermediary factors between NASH and cardiovascular disease are still unknown. We investigated whether NASH aggravates nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibition‐induced arteriosclerosis in SHRSP5/Dmcr rats. Wistar Kyoto and SHRSP5/Dmcr rats were divided into 4 groups of 5 and fed the stroke‐prone (SP) or HFC diets for 8 weeks. To induce NO synthase inhibition, Nω‐nitro‐L‐arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (L‐NAME) mixed with drinking water was administered in the final 2 weeks. The NASH+L‐NAME group demonstrated the following characteristics related to arteriosclerosis and myocardial ischaemia: (a) LV systolic dysfunction with asynergy, (b) replacement fibrosis caused by the shedding of cardiomyocytes and (c) arterial lipid deposition and coronary occlusion secondary to endothelial dysfunction. These characteristics were not observed in the NASH or non‐NASH+L‐NAME groups. The SHRSP5/Dmcr rat model demonstrates that NASH significantly aggravates cardiovascular risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: