Why the study?
Does the ECG-edit function provide acceptable image quality in patients with arrhythmias undergoing coronary MDCT?
Does the ECG-edit function provide acceptable image quality in patients with arrhythmias undergoing coronary MDCT?
The ECG-edit function provides clinically acceptable coronary MDCT images in the majority of patients with arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation and premature contractions.
May support ECG-edit for MDCT image quality in arrhythmias; leaves open prospective validation of diagnostic accuracy.
BACKGROUND: ECG-gating is necessary for cardiac computed tomography, but is not suitable for arrhythmias, so the aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the ECG-edit function for this purpose. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 1,221 patients undergoing 64-row multidetector-row computed tomography coronary angiography (coronary MDCT), 123 patients (28 atrial fibrillation (Af), 39 premature atrial contractions (PAC), 42 premature ventricular contractions (PVC), 3 PAC + PVC, 10 sinus arrhythmias (SA), and a second-degree atrioventricular block (2 degrees AVB)) had arrhythmias necessitating the ECG-edit function. Short R-R interval was deleted and mid-diastolic phases were selected from the long R-R intervals using the "R+absolute time" method. In the present study, the reconstructed images were evaluated using a triple-grade scale A-C, representing excellent, acceptable, and unacceptable image quality. Image quality, categorized as A, B and C, respectively, was 50%, 36% and 14% for the 28 patients with Af; 56%, 36% and 8% for the 39 PAC patients, and 65%, 33% and 2% in the 42 PVC patients. None of the scans of the PAC + PVC, SA, and 2 degrees AVB patients was ranked as C. CONCLUSIONS: The ECG-edit function is useful for reconstructing coronary MDCT images in many arrhythmias, and provides clinically acceptable images in most cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsutani et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: