Comparing the Staging/Restaging Performance of 68Ga-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen and 18F-Choline PET/CT in Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE: PET/CT using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and choline radiotracers is widely used for diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, the roles of and differences in diagnostic performance between these 2 radiotracers for prostate cancer are unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the staging and restaging performance of Ga-labeled PSMA and F-choline PET/CT imaging in prostate cancer. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed for studies reporting the staging performance of Ga-PSMA and F-choline PET/CT in prostate cancer from the inception of the database to October 1, 2018, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Thirty-five studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled estimates of patient- and lesion-based sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for Ga-PSMA and F-choline PET/CT were calculated alongside 95% confidence intervals. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted, and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was determined alongside the Q* index. RESULTS: The patient-based overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC of Ga-PSMA PET/CT for staging in prostate cancer (13 studies) were 0.92, 0.94, 7.91, 0.14, 79.04, and 0.96, respectively, whereas those of F-choline PET/CT (16 studies) were 0.93, 0.83, 4.98, 0.10, 68.27, and 0.95. The lesion-based overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC of Ga-PSMA PET/CT for staging in prostate cancer (9 studies) were 0.83, 0.95, 23.30, 0.17, 153.58, and 0.94, respectively, and those of F-choline PET/CT (4 studies) were 0.81, 0.92, 8.59, 0.20, 44.82, and 0.98. In both patient- and lesion-based imaging, there was no statistically significant difference in the abilities of detecting or excluding prostate cancer between Ga-PSMA PET/CT and F-choline PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS: For staging and restaging performance in patients with prostate cancer, there was no significant difference between Ga-PSMA PET/CT and F-choline PET/CT. Ga-PSMA PET/CT and F-choline PET/CT have demonstrated high diagnostic performance for accurate staging and restaging in patients with prostate cancer, and thus both should be considered for staging in this disease.