Why the study?
Many patients presenting with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome show non-obstructive coronary artery disease, but whether vascular and cardiac autonomic function differ by coronary anatomy was unknown.
Does obstructive coronary artery disease compared to non-obstructive disease affect vascular dilator function and cardiac autonomic function in patients with NSTE-ACS?
Observational (n=120)
Does obstructive coronary artery disease compared to non-obstructive disease affect vascular dilator function and cardiac autonomic function in patients with NSTE-ACS?
Vascular dilator function and cardiac autonomic function do not differ significantly between NSTE-ACS patients with obstructive versus non-obstructive coronary artery disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No differences in vascular or autonomic function by CAD status in NSTE-ACS; leaves open mechanisms of non-obstructive presentations for targeted study.
Background A sizeable number of patients with a diagnosis of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome show non-obstructive coronary artery disease. In this study we assessed whether differences in vascular and cardiac autonomic function exist between non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients with obstructive or non-obstructive coronary artery disease. Methods and results Systemic endothelium-dependent and independent vascular dilator function (assessed by flow-mediated dilation and nitrate-mediated dilation of the brachial artery, respectively) and cardiac autonomic function (assessed by time-domain and frequency-domain heart rate variability parameters) were assessed on admission in 120 patients with a diagnosis of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Patients were divided into two groups according to coronary angiography findings: (a) 59 (49.2%) with obstructive coronary artery disease (≥50% stenosis in any epicardial arteries); (b) 61 (50.8%) with non-obstructive coronary artery disease. No significant differences between the two groups were found in both flow-mediated dilation (5.03 ± 2.6 vs. 5.40 ± 2.5%, respectively; P = 0.37) and nitrate-mediated dilatation (6.79 ± 2.8 vs. 7.30 ± 3.4%, respectively; P = 0.37). No significant differences were also observed between the two groups both in time-domain and frequency-domain heart rate variability variables, although the triangular index tended to be lower in obstructive coronary artery disease patients (30.2 ± 9.5 vs. 33.9 ± 11.6, respectively; P = 0.058). Neither vascular nor heart rate variability variables predicted the recurrence of angina, requiring emergency room admission or re-hospitalisation, during 11.3 months of follow-up. Conclusions Among patients admitted with a diagnosis of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome we found no significant differences in systemic vascular dilator function and cardiac autonomic function between those with obstructive coronary artery disease and those with non-obstructive coronary artery disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lanza et al. (2020) conducted an observational in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (n=120). Obstructive coronary artery disease (≥50% stenosis) vs. Non-obstructive coronary artery disease was evaluated on Systemic endothelium-dependent vascular dilator function (flow-mediated dilation) (p=0.37).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: