Key result
Denali IVC filter achieves a ~99% technical success rate for placement and safe retrieval.
Why the study?
The efficacy and safety of the Denali nitinol retrievable inferior vena cava filter for protection against pulmonary embolism required evaluation over a 2-year period.
Does the Denali IVC filter provide safe and effective caval filtration and retrieval in patients with temporary indications?
Does the Denali IVC filter provide safe and effective caval filtration and retrieval in patients with temporary indications?
The Denali IVC filter demonstrates high technical and clinical success rates for both placement and retrieval with a low complication profile.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports Denali filter consideration for temporary indications; leaves open randomized comparisons to alternatives.
PURPOSE To report the final 2-year data on the efficacy and safety of a nitinol retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filter for protection against pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a prospective multicenter trial of 200 patients with temporary indications for caval filtration who underwent implantation of the Denali IVC filter. After filter placement, all patients were followed for 2 years after placement or 30 days after filter retrieval. The primary endpoints were technical success of filter implantation in the intended location and clinical success of filter placement and retrieval. Secondary endpoints were incidence of clinically symptomatic recurrent PE, new or propagating deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and filter-related complications including migration, fracture, penetration, and tilt. RESULTS Filter placement was technically successful in 199 patients (99.5%). Filters were clinically successful in 190 patients (95%). The rate of PE was 3% (n = 6), with 5 patients having a small subsegmental PE and 1 having a lobar PE. New or worsening DVT was noted in 26 patients (13%). Filter retrieval was attempted 125 times in 124 patients and was technically successful in 121 patients (97.6%). The mean filter dwell time at retrieval was 200.8 days (range, 5-736 d). There were no instances of filter fracture, migration, or tilt greater than 15° at the time of filter retrieval or during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The Denali IVC filter exhibited high success rates for filter placement and retrieval while maintaining a low complication rate in this clinical trial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stavropoulos et al. (2016) studied Temporary indications for caval filtration for protection against pulmonary embolism (n=200). Denali IVC filter was evaluated on Technical success of filter implantation in the intended location and clinical success of filter placement and retrieval. Implantation of the Denali IVC filter demonstrated a 99.5% technical success rate and a 95% clinical success rate for placement, alongside a 97.6% technical success rate for retrieval.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: