Why the study?
What are the predictors and frequency of adverse events in transcatheter interventions for congenital heart disease?
What are the predictors and frequency of adverse events in transcatheter interventions for congenital heart disease?
Transcatheter interventions for congenital heart disease have a 13% adverse event rate, which has decreased over time, with higher risk procedures predicting adverse events.
Procedure risk categories may aid counseling in congenital interventions; extends risk models but leaves open prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: Few studies have reported procedure complications or adverse events for transcatheter interventions in unselected congenital heart disease cohorts. We report our 23-year experience with transcatheter interventions in congenital heart disease and examine predictors for adverse events. DESIGN AND SETTING: This study was a population-based cohort study of children and adults with congenital heart disease, covering a population of 3 million inhabitants in western Denmark. Adverse events were subdivided into 5 levels according to their severity. Procedure-type risk category, age, weight, and year of procedure were included in multivariate logistic models to identify risk factors for adverse events. RESULTS: Between 1990 and 2012, 1595 patients had 1878 catheter-based interventions performed. We identified 241 adverse events, corresponding to 13% of the procedures; 58 (3%) were considered to be of high severity. During the study period, there was an increase in number of procedures per year (P < .001) and a decrease in frequency of adverse events (P = .01). Procedure-type categories 3 and 4 had increased risk of adverse events when compared with category 2, with odds ratios of 1.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-2.3) for category 3 and 2.3 for category 4 (95% CI: 1.4-3.6). Age and weight at catheterization were not independently associated with adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: We found an increase in number of procedures over time and a decrease in frequency of adverse events. Higher procedure-type risk categories were associated with increased risk of adverse events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Larsen et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: