In this study, a solid-phase microextraction (SPME) method was developed for the purification of mRNA (mRNA) from complex biological samples using a real-time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay for quantification. The chemical composition of the polymeric ionic liquid (PIL) and a polyacrylate (PA) SPME sorbent coating was optimized to enhance the extraction performance. Of the studied SPME sorbent coatings, the PIL containing carboxylic acid moieties in the monomer and halide-based anions extracted the highest amount of mRNA from aqueous solutions, whereas the native PA fiber showed the lowest extraction efficiency. On the basis of RT-qPCR data, electrostatic interactions and an ion-exchange mechanism between the negatively charged phosphate backbone of RNA and the PIL cation framework were the major driving forces for mRNA extraction. The optimized PIL-based SPME method purified a high quantity of mRNA from crude yeast cell lysate compared to a phenol/chloroform extraction method. The reusability and robustness of PIL-based SPME for RNA analysis represents a significant advantage over conventional silica-based solid-phase RNA extraction kits. The selectivity of the SPME method toward mRNA was enhanced by functionalizing the PA sorbent with oligo dT 20 using carbodiimide-based amide linker chemistry. The oligo dT 20 -modified PA sorbent coating demonstrated superior extraction performance than the native PA sorbent coating with quantification cycle (Cq) values 33.74 ± 0.24 and 39, respectively. The modified PA sorbent extracted sufficient mRNA from total RNA at concentrations as low as 5 ng μL –1 in aqueous solutions without the use of organic solvents and time-consuming multiple centrifugation steps that are required in traditional RNA extraction methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nacham et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: