Why the study?
The causes of coronary slow flow phenomenon are unknown, and its pathogenesis, effective treatment, and long-term prognosis require more research, prompting evaluation of biventricular systolic and diastolic function.
Does primary Slow Coronary Flow affect left and right ventricular systolic and diastolic function compared to Normal Coronary Flow?
Does primary Slow Coronary Flow affect left and right ventricular systolic and diastolic function compared to Normal Coronary Flow?
Primary Slow Coronary Flow does not appear to be associated with significant differences in left or right ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction compared to normal coronary flow.
Aims: The Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon (CSFP) is a syndrome which according to normal or near normal angiography findings is characterized by delayed progression of the injected contrast medium through the coronary vessels. The causes of this disease are unknown. Therefore, the identification of the disease’s pathogen, an effective cure and the long-term prognosis of these patients is still in need of more research. This research attempts to analyze and compare the systolic and diastolic function of the left and right ventricle in people affected by primary Slow Coronary Flow and Normal Coronary Flow. Methods and Results: This case-control study was conducted with the participation of 44 patients undergoing coronary angiography in Qazvin’s Bu Ali Sina Hospital in 2017. The patients were divided in two groups of primary Slow Coronary Flow (33 people) and Normal Coronary Flow (11 people) and the systolic and diastolic function of the left ventricle and the systolic function of the right ventricle was analyzed and compared between the two groups. The frequency of left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction and right ventricular systolic dysfunction was similar and no significant statistical difference was seen between the two groups. Conclusion: In this research the frequency of left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction and right ventricular systolic dysfunction was similar and no significant statistical difference was seen between the two primary Slow Coronary Flow and Normal Coronary Flow groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Javadi et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: