Why the study?
Does MRI evaluation of physeal involvement predict prognosis in patients with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease?
Does MRI evaluation of physeal involvement predict prognosis in patients with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease?
MRI evaluation of physeal involvement has a high predictive value for prognosis in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.
May support MRI physeal assessment for Legg-Calvé-Perthes prognosis; leaves open impact on treatment decisions.
Twenty-eight unselected hips affected by Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease (LCPD) in 24 patients from 1987 to 1994 had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed. The patients were retrospectively reviewed at a mean follow-up of 5.4 years. An interobserver blind analysis was made to establish the reliability of four MRI parameters: extent of epiphyseal necrosis (EXT), lateral extrusion of the femoral head (LAT), physeal involvement (PHY), and metaphyseal changes (MET). The interobserver analysis resulted in a good reliability for all MRI parameters (concordance, >80%; K index, >0.45). A statistical correlation study (Spearman test) was then done between each MRI parameter and the condition of the hips at follow-up evaluated by Stulberg class and a personal scored system (total score) of clinical–radiographic condition. All MRI parameters appeared well correlated to the Stulberg class and to the total score (S > 0.66;p < 0.05). PHY resulted the strongest correlated parameter (S = 0.84 for Stulberg class; S = 0.91 for total score). Finally our statistical correlation study demonstrates physis involvement to have a high predictive value in LCPD; therefore it can be assumed as the main risk factor in formulating prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanctis et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: