Why the study?
Does MR imaging provide better diagnostic information compared to conventional radiography, arthrography, and bone scintigraphy in patients with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease?
Does MR imaging provide better diagnostic information compared to conventional radiography, arthrography, and bone scintigraphy in patients with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease?
MR imaging provides superior anatomical and pathophysiological information regarding femoral head involvement and revascularisation in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease compared to conventional radiography and bone scintigraphy.
MR may refine femoral head assessment in Perthes disease; leaves open whether it changes management or outcomes.
In a prospective study of 22 patients (24 hips) with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) the findings at conventional radiography, arthrography, bone scintigraphy and MR imaging, obtained at the time of diagnosis, were compared. MR was superior to conventional radiography and bone scintigraphy in the detection of the extent of involvement in the femoral head. Arthrography was as good as or better than MR imaging in determining the shape of the articular surfaces and the occurrence of lateral subluxation. Conventional radiography was less sensitive in identifying the degree of lateral subluxation and the extent of the necrosis in the femoral head. MR imaging provided anatomical and pathophysiological information about the extent and location of head involvement as well as the degree of lateral subluxation. Revascularisation was more clearly demonstrated with MR than with bone scintigraphy, irrespective of symptom duration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaniklides et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: