Mixed-methods study demonstrates low baseline awareness but strong stakeholder support for WHO competency integration across healthcare trainees, highlighting the utility of simulation learning.
Background: The 2020 World Health Organization Rehabilitation Competencies Framework (RCF) provides a comprehensive foundation for developing interprofessional competencies across rehabilitation disciplines. However, limited awareness and systematic integration of this framework into existing curricula represents a significant gap in competency-based health education which undermines efforts to standardize interprofessional practice competencies globally. Methods: This mixed-method, two-phase study explored stakeholder perspectives on RCF integration within an interprofessional education curriculum at a School of Health and Medical Sciences. Phase One employed a cross-sectional survey (n=63) examining RCF awareness and perceived domain priorities across five disciplines (Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Speech Language Pathology, Athletic Training, and Physician Assistant). Phase Two utilized semi-structured interviews with faculty and students to validate findings and explore implementation strategies through thematic analysis guided by social constructivist learning theory. Results: RCF awareness was significantly limited (15% students, 23% faculty; χ² = 4.23, p < 0.05). The "Practice" domain emerged as the highest priority across all stakeholders (>75%), with emphasis on effective communication and problem-solving competencies. Qualitative analysis revealed four salient themes aligned with experiential learning theory: "realism in action," "increased complexity," "non-error-less learning," and "feedback and re-run," highlighting the need for simulation-based interprofessional learning experiences. Conclusions: Systematic integration of the WHO RCF into existing interprofessional curricula is feasible through comprehensive stakeholder engagement and theoretically-grounded curriculum design. The study provides a replicable, evidence-based methodology for educational institutions seeking to enhance competency-based training programs through experiential learning approaches that bridge theory and practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: