Key result
Pre-thrombectomy tenecteplase benefits only low-ASPECTS stroke patients, showing no functional improvement with higher scores.
Why the study?
Does intravenous tenecteplase before thrombectomy improve functional independence in acute large-vessel occlusion stroke patients stratified by baseline ASPECTS?
RCT
Yes
Does intravenous tenecteplase before thrombectomy improve functional independence in acute large-vessel occlusion stroke patients stratified by baseline ASPECTS?
p-value: p=0.04
Intravenous tenecteplase before thrombectomy may offer functional benefit in acute large-vessel occlusion stroke patients with larger baseline ischemic cores (ASPECTS <8), but not in those with smaller cores (ASPECTS 8-10).
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The impact of ischemic extent on the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis before thrombectomy remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the baseline ischemic extent, measured by the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS), modifies outcomes of intravenous tenecteplase administered before endovascular thrombectomy. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the BRIDGE-TNK (thrombectomy with vs without rhTNK-tPA in stroke) trial, conducted across China from May 2022 to September 2024. We compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous tenecteplase plus thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone in acute large-vessel occlusion stroke patients within 4.5 hours of last known well, stratified by baseline ASPECTS (<8 vs 8-10). The outcomes included 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2), 48-hour symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality. Regression models incorporating a treatment-by-ASPECTS interaction term were used for analysis. RESULTS: = 0.04). DISCUSSION: In this exploratory post hoc analysis, a signal of benefit was observed in patients with ASPECTS <8 who received intravenous tenecteplase before thrombectomy, whereas no functional improvement and possible safety concerns were seen in those with ASPECTS 8-10. Prospective confirmation in randomized trials is required before practice change. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04733742.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Acute large-vessel occlusion stroke. Intravenous tenecteplase plus thrombectomy vs. Thrombectomy alone was evaluated on 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) (p=0.04). Intravenous tenecteplase before thrombectomy showed a signal of benefit in patients with ASPECTS <8, but no functional improvement and possible safety concerns in those with ASPECTS 8-10 (P=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: