Qualitative analysis reveals both micro-level interactional and macro-level structural stigma among parents of learning-disabled adults, highlighting ways to integrate Goffman with disability studies.
Erving Goffman cuts a divisive figure in disability studies. Some criticize his conception of “stigma” as deviance‐focused and as ignoring structural forces that shape personal encounters. Others praise his recognition of stigma as an interactional phenomenon. Drawing on research with parents of learning‐disabled adults, I conceptualize stigma in interactionist (Goffman‐inspired) and structural (disability‐studies‐inspired) terms. Parents reflect positively on their lives yet can confront stigma in “micro” public interactions. Stigma is also located in encounters with “macro” institutions. I conclude by highlighting how building upon Goffman's scholarship helps to thaw out a historically frosty treatment of his contribution in disability studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gareth Thomas (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: