Serum HAI (hemagglutination inhibition) antibody responses were compared in two groups of 70 age-matched patients (age range, 17 to 82 years) who were vaccinated with bivalent influenza A/New Jersey/76-A/Victoria/75 whole-virus vaccine. The group that was vaccinated intradermally received 40 chick cell-agglutinating units of each viral antigen in 0.1 ml, and the group that was vaccinated subcutaneously received 200 chick cell-agglutinating units of each antigen in 0.5 ml. The serum HAI antibody response to A/New Jersey/76 antigen was significantly higher in the group that was vaccinated subcutaneously; this difference was particularly evident in patients less than or equal to 50 years old. The serologic response to A/Victoria/75 antigen did not differ significantly between the two groups. Levels of antibody before vaccination indicated previous widespread exposure of patients to influenza A/Victoria/75 virus, but not to influenza A/New Jersey/76 virus. Such differences in prior immunologic experience with a particular strain of influenza virus probably determine whether the intradermal route of vaccination is as effective as, or inferior to, the subcutaneous route.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herbert et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: