Instrumental variable analysis reveals that strong ESG performance reduces stock price synchronicity in listed firms, indicating improved incorporation of firm-specific information.
As environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices become increasingly central to corporate strategy, understanding their impact on capital market efficiency becomes crucial for investors and policymakers. This study examines the relationship between ESG performance and stock price synchronicity using data from Chinese A-share listed companies during 2010-2022. Employing two-stage least squares estimation with regional ventilation coefficients as instrumental variables, we find that ESG performance significantly reduces stock price synchronicity—a result more consistent with the idiosyncratic information hypothesis than with the noise reduction hypothesis that has dominated prior Chinese market studies. We further document a reverse channel whereby high synchronicity prompts firms to strengthen their ESG practices, suggesting that OLS-based estimates of the ESG–synchronicity relationship are likely subject to reverse causality bias; our instrumental variable approach addresses this endogeneity and provides a more credible identification of the causal effect. Mechanism analysis reveals that ESG performance operates through two channels: enhancing corporate innovation and attracting institutional investor investment, both of which facilitate the incorporation of firm-specific information into stock prices. Heterogeneity analysis shows that these effects concentrate among firms with higher analyst coverage, lower financial reporting quality, and private ownership—conditions under which ESG disclosure carries greater informational value for price discovery. These findings carry implications for the design of ESG disclosure standards and governance reforms aimed at enhancing capital market efficiency in emerging markets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: