Laboratory study reveals distinct ion-specific stabilization mechanisms in sensitive quick clay, highlighting key chemical factors for designing rapid ground improvement binders.
This study investigates (1) the applicability of parallel plate rheology for assessing quick clay stabilisation by inorganic salts and (2) the short-term stabilising effects of selected cation–anion combinations. Quick clay from the Tiller-Flotten geotechnical test site was treated with salt solutions containing Na + , K + , Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ paired with Cl − , OH − , SO 4 2− and CO 3 2− at concentrations between 0.037 and 0.6 M. A dedicated rheometer protocol enabled extraction of dynamic and static yield shear strengths and structural build-up, revealing non-Newtonian shear-thinning behaviour. Dynamic yield strength from the upwards flow curve was used as the primary parameter and showed good correlation with falling-cone shear strength, with rheology offering higher precision, reproducibility, and reduced sample size. Increasing salt concentration consistently enhanced shear strength, with clear ion-specific trends. Divalent chlorides (CaCl 2 , MgCl 2 ) were most effective at low concentrations but reached a plateau near 0.2 M, while monovalent chlorides continued to increase the strength, with KCl outperforming NaCl at higher concentrations due to the smaller hydration shell and stronger adsorption of K + . Anion effects were strongly governed by pH: Cl − and SO 4 2− (neutral pH) promoted flocculation at low concentrations, whereas OH − and CO 3 2− (high pH) required higher cation concentrations to counteract initial deflocculation. Ca(OH) 2 produced the highest shear strength overall. The geotechnical stability criterion of 0.33 kPa was reached for all K-salts and for Ca(OH) 2 . Overall, the results show that short-term stabilisation of quick clay is controlled by cation valence, hydration radius, and anion-dependent pH, providing a mechanistic basis for designing more efficient binders for rapid ground improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zabłocka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: