In vitro study demonstrates that novel peptide 2_5 suppresses ERK1/2 and SMAD2 signaling in HEK293T cells, suggesting a potential selective strategy for TGF-β pathway inhibition.
Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) contributes to fibrosis, immunosuppression, and tumor progression, but systemic TGF-β inhibition is limited by toxicity and lack of selectivity. This exploratory proof-of-concept study evaluated novel peptides designed to target the TGF-β receptor I/II complex and examined their effects on canonical and noncanonical TGF-β signaling in vitro. Peptides 2_5 and 2_6, selected by in silico docking of receptor-ligand interface-derived sequences, were tested in human embryonic kidney 293T (HEK293T) cells at 20 and 50 μM, with the TGF-β receptor I inhibitor SD-208 as a reference. Total and phosphorylated SMAD2, SMAD3, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) were assessed by Western blotting and densitometry. Peptide 2_5 showed the strongest activity, reducing total ERK1/2 by 65% at 50 μM and phosphorylated ERK1/2 by 90.4% and 83.4% at 20 and 50 μM, respectively; SD-208 reduced total and phosphorylated ERK1/2 by 64.3% and 54.5%, respectively. Peptide 2_5 also reduced total SMAD2 by 81% at 50 μM, whereas its effect on SMAD2 phosphorylation was inconsistent. Peptide 2_6 showed minimal effects, JNK was largely unaffected, and SMAD3 results were inconclusive because of weak signals. These preliminary findings suggest that peptide 2_5 may differentially modulate TGF-β signaling, with a stronger effect on ERK1/2 than on SMAD2; however, receptor targeting and pathway selectivity require confirmation in fully replicated quantitative studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Plichta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: