Experimental study demonstrates that dependency learnability varies with rhyme and semantic cues, suggesting formal grammatical complexity alone does not determine processing ease.
Artificial grammar learning (AGL) studies have long compared the learnability of abstracted grammars, such as those employing center-embedded (CE) and cross-serial (CS) dependencies. This area remains relevant because experimental findings contradict predictions based on grammatical complexity alone: CE structures are found to be either more difficult or not reliably different to process than CS ones, despite being grammatically simpler. Another area of AGL research has investigated the role of cue salience, finding that semantic relatedness or and prosodic marking between lexical elements can affect performance. This thesis synthesizes these two areas of AGL research, using two vocabularies with identical lexical material to compare the learnability of CE and CS grammars in which dependencies are determined by either semantic relatedness, or rhyme. Findings support the notion that performance on CE vs CS AGL tasks is shaped not only by formal structure, but also the nature of the relationship linking dependent elements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Judah Bachmann (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: