Key result
Lower TAPSE/sPAP ratio linked to ~66% greater odds of advanced functional impairment in PAH.
Why the study?
The relationship between the TAPSE/sPAP ratio, a non-invasive surrogate of RV-PA coupling, and clinically assessed functional impairment in PAH remains incompletely characterized.
Does the TAPSE/sPAP ratio correlate with functional impairment (WHO-FC) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Cross-Sectional (n=150)
No
Does the TAPSE/sPAP ratio correlate with functional impairment (WHO-FC) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Odds Ratio: 1.659 (95% CI 1.299–2.119)
p-value: p=<0.001
The TAPSE/sPAP ratio serves as a strong, objective echocardiographic correlate of functional impairment in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, complementing traditional symptom-based WHO functional class assessment.
TAPSE/sPAP may track functional class in PAH; leaves open incremental prognostic utility beyond established markers.
Right ventricular–pulmonary arterial (RV–PA) coupling is a key determinant of disease severity and prognosis in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (TAPSE/sPAP) ratio is an established non-invasive surrogate of RV–PA coupling; however, its relationship with clinically assessed functional impairment remains incompletely characterized. We investigated the association between TAPSE/sPAP and World Health Organization functional class (WHO-FC) in patients with PAH. This retrospective study included 150 consecutive patients with established PAH receiving PAH-specific therapy who underwent routine clinical evaluation, transthoracic echocardiography, laboratory testing, and six-minute walk testing during the same scheduled outpatient follow-up visit. Patients were categorized as WHO-FC I–II or WHO-FC III–IV. Associations between TAPSE/sPAP and clinical, haemodynamic, echocardiographic, and laboratory parameters were evaluated using correlation and multivariable logistic regression analyses. The previously reported TAPSE/sPAP threshold (≤ 0.31 mm/mmHg) was assessed for identifying advanced functional impairment. Patients with WHO-FC III–IV demonstrated significantly lower TAPSE/sPAP ratios, reduced exercise capacity, and higher pulmonary vascular resistance and lower cardiac output at the diagnostic right heart catheterisation than those with WHO-FC I–II (all p < 0.001). TAPSE/sPAP declined progressively across increasing WHO-FC ( p for trend < 0.001) and showed significant correlations with pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and cardiac output recorded at the diagnostic catheterisation, with TAPSE, and with six-minute walk distance. In multivariable analysis, TAPSE/sPAP and six-minute walk distance remained independently associated with WHO-FC III–IV, whereas RDW-SD and the CRP/albumin ratio did not. Analysed as a continuous variable, TAPSE/sPAP identified WHO-FC III–IV with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.874; when the prespecified threshold of ≤ 0.31 mm/mmHg was applied as a binary classifier, specificity was 96.7% and sensitivity 64.4%. The TAPSE/sPAP ratio showed consistent associations with clinically assessed functional impairment and exercise capacity, and was also correlated with selected haemodynamic parameters obtained at diagnostic assessment.These findings support TAPSE/sPAP as an objective echocardiographic correlate of functional impairment that may complement, rather than replace, conventional symptom-based functional assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Savcılıoğlu et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Pulmonary arterial hypertension (n=150). TAPSE/sPAP ratio vs. Higher TAPSE/sPAP ratio was evaluated on Advanced functional impairment (WHO-FC III-IV) (OR 1.659, 95% CI 1.299-2.119, p=<0.001). A lower TAPSE/sPAP ratio was independently associated with advanced functional impairment (WHO-FC III-IV) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.659 per 0.1 mm/mmHg decrease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: