Qualitative interview study reveals high variability in cognitive impairment assessment in primary care dyads, highlighting the need for clinical decision support tools.
Despite increasing pressure on primary care clinicians to provide accurate and timely assessment and diagnosis of cognitive impairment (CI), many remain unprepared. To inform improvement, we conducted interviews with 20 dyads of recently diagnosed patients and their care partners (spouses or adult children) to better understand experiences with CI assessment and diagnosis in primary care. Dyads reported wide variation in how primary care responded to their initial cognitive concerns, ranging from compassionate prioritization to minimization or attribution to age and/or physical comorbidities. Dyads also reported variability in testing, time to diagnosis, and the CI diagnosis experience. Many dyads described the challenges of living with CI including stigma, loneliness, and a desire for more support from primary care clinicians. Results identify specific areas of potential improvement in the primary care of individuals with cognitive concerns that should be embedded into point-of-care clinical decision support tools for primary care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henderson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: