Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Response surface modeling demonstrates optimized strength and drainage in supplementary cementitious pervious concrete, indicating viable pathways for tailored permeable pavements.
Pervious concrete must balance mechanical capacity with interconnected voids required for drainage. A three-factor, three-level Box–Behnken design examined fly ash (FA; 10–20%), metakaolin (MK; 5–15%), and nano-silica (NS; 0.5–1.5%) at a fixed total binder content of 380 kg/m3. Compressive strength, water-accessible open porosity, and the apparent permeability coefficient ranged from 16.80 to 28.20 MPa, 14.07 to 24.50%, and 2.20 to 7.29 mm/s, respectively. Quadratic models for compressive strength and the apparent permeability coefficient were statistically adequate (R2 = 0.9907 and 0.9861); the porosity model showed significant lack of fit. The porosity model was retained only for local trend interpretation and excluded from optimization. In a researcher-defined design scenario that maximized strength while targeting an apparent permeability coefficient of 3.00 mm/s, desirability analysis selected a model-predicted compromise solution containing 14.038% FA, 12.556% MK, and 1.483% NS, with a predicted compressive strength and an apparent permeability coefficient of 28.233 MPa and 3.000 mm/s. The NS factor was close to the upper boundary, and the solution was not experimentally validated. Selected single-field SEM observations illustrated local differences among M5, M7, and M12, while selected-area EDS sum spectra provided only local elemental composition information. The results indicate potential for future pavement evaluation after independent validation, multi-field microstructural analysis, durability testing, and economic assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Junru et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: