Why the study?
Submuscular CIED implantation is mostly performed under local anaesthesia, but adequate perioperative pain management is critical to prevent persistent opioid use, prompting comparison with regional block techniques.
Does pectoserratus plain/interpectoral plain (PSP/IPP) block with ropivacaine improve Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores compared to local anaesthesia with lidocaine in patients undergoing submuscular CIED implantation?
Does pectoserratus plain/interpectoral plain (PSP/IPP) block with ropivacaine improve Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores compared to local anaesthesia with lidocaine in patients undergoing submuscular CIED implantation?
This trial protocol outlines a study to determine if regional anesthesia improves postoperative recovery quality compared to local anesthesia in patients undergoing submuscular CIED implantation.
Regional blocks may curb persistent opioid use after CIED implantation; this RCT leaves open whether PSP/IPP improves recovery versus local anesthesia.
BACKGROUND: The implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is the treatment of choice for the prevention of sudden cardiac deaths in high-risk patients. Given the comorbidities, this superficial surgical intervention is mostly performed in local anaesthesia. Triggered by the upcoming opioid crisis, the burden of postsurgical pain has gained popularity, as adequate perioperative pain management is a cornerstone in the prevention of persistent opioid use. Aim of this study is to assess the perioperative pain management of local anaesthesia versus pectoserratus plain/interpectoral plain (PSP/IPP) block for submuscular CIED implantation. METHODS: In a single-centre, prospective, single-blinded, two-group randomized trial, 80 patients undergoing submuscular CIED implantation will be randomized to receive a PSP/IPP with ropivacaine 0.375% (intervention group) or a LA with lidocaine 2% (control group). The primary outcome is the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) assessed 24 h after surgery. Secondary endpoints include the intraoperative additional LA administration; the postoperative analgesic consumption; the need and dose of additional analgesia; Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h; and VAS-AUC and VAS groups <30 mm/30-60 mm/>60 mm. DISCUSSION: This prospective, randomized, controlled, and single-blinded trial aims to assess if a PSP/IPP with ropivacaine affects the postoperative QoR-15 score compared to a conventional local anaesthesia with lidocaine in patients undergoing submuscular CIED implantation. Given the impressively high rate of persistent opioid use (POU) in patients after CIED, results from this study could help improve the perioperative pain management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EUDRA CT Number: 2023-508997-27. Registered on 20 September 2024. https://euclinicaltrials.eu/search-for-clinical-trials/?lang=en&EUCT=2023-508997-27-00 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wallner et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: