Retrospective case series finds a 2.9% rate of retinal pigment epithelium tears following anti-VEGF therapy in neovascular AMD, indicating no elevated risk with higher-dose or newer agents.
Purpose: We aimed to describe retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) tears in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and pigment epithelial detachment (PED), focusing on OCT features and AI-assisted image analysis. Methods: This retrospective case series included patients with neovascular AMD and PED who developed RPE tears between 2020 and 2025 after treatment with intravitreal aflibercept (2 mg or 8 mg) or faricimab. Multimodal imaging, including spectral-domain OCT and infrared imaging, was reviewed. PED morphology, fluid characteristics, RPE denudation, timing of RPE tear, and visual outcomes were analyzed using manual grading and AI-assisted software. Results: Among 375 PED-bearing eyes, 11 eyes of 11 patients developed an RPE tear (2.9%), of which 10 (90.9%) were temporally associated with anti-VEGF treatment. Rates were similar across agents—2.7% (aflibercept 2 mg), 3.0% (aflibercept 8 mg) and 2.4% (faricimab)—with no significant difference. Eight eyes (72.7%) were treatment-naïve and one tear (9.1%) occurred spontaneously after hemorrhage without recent injection. Among treatment-associated tears, 30% followed the first and 50% the second injection (mean 2.1 injections), detected a mean of 44 ± 30 days after the last injection. Mean baseline PED height was 594.8 ± 239.2 μm and median AI-derived PED volume was 2922 nL. Mean RPE-denudation area at detection was 5.25 ± 3.87 mm2, remaining stable in 7 of 9 evaluable eyes. Visual acuity was stable or improved in seven eyes; four lost ≥15 ETDRS letters. Conclusions: RPE tears were an uncommon, predominantly early complication occurring in eyes with large PEDs, with no excess risk from second-generation agents. AI-assisted OCT may aid anatomical characterisation, and most eyes retained vision with continued therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eggarter et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: