Computational archive demonstrates full numerical reproducibility in four gravitational model evaluations, verifying consistent dynamical and cosmological calculations.
This deposit contains the complete numerical deposits backing the four papers of the Temporal Texture Gravity series (Papers A–D, linked below). Each sub-deposit was executed against a frozen preregistration (with dated amendments appended before any classified result was produced) and ships with a run report and a SHA-256 hash manifest, so every file's integrity can be verified independently. Contents: deposit_A — 120-trajectory healthy-basin scan of the stabilized-branch background system (Paper A); deposit_B — coupled-background dark-energy integration w_DE(z) and activation-boundary transition scan (Paper B); deposit_C — trapped-mode virial test and SMBH Lomb–Scargle sensitivity study (Paper C); deposit_D — Monte Carlo verification of the imported singlet Born distribution at optimal CHSH angles (Paper D); deposit_SPARC — chronostasis halo test on 121 SPARC galaxies passing frozen quality cuts. All numbers quoted in the papers are produced by the deposited code; none are transcribed from external sources. Reproduction environments and entry points are documented in each folder's DEPOSIT_REPORT.md (Python 3, numpy 2.2.5, scipy 1.16.2, gcc for the C cores). Related publications (DOI cites all versions): Paper A 10.5281/zenodo.22026049 — Paper B 10.5281/zenodo.22026198 — Paper C 10.5281/zenodo.22026273 — Paper D 10.5281/zenodo.22026359 — Master document (dormant research base) 10.5281/zenodo.22026485.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thierry Marechal (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: