Retrospective study observes low relapse rates with active surveillance in stage I seminoma, indicating the safety of de-escalated post-orchiectomy management.
Background To evaluate long-term outcomes, relapse patterns and clinicopathological factors associated with recurrence in patients with clinical stage I seminoma managed in routine practice over three decades. Methods We performed a retrospective single-centre study including patients diagnosed with clinical stage I seminoma between 1993 and 2025. Baseline clinicopathological features, treatment strategy after orchiectomy, relapse events and relapse timing were collected. Post-orchiectomy management was classified as active surveillance or adjuvant carboplatin. Associations between clinicopathological variables and relapse were explored using descriptive statistics and Cramér’s V. Results A total of 113 patients were included. Median age at diagnosis was 36 years. Overall, 21.2% had stage IB disease. Tumour size was greater than 4 cm in 56.0% of patients, rete testis invasion was present in 26.5%, and lymphovascular invasion was identified in 16.8%. After orchiectomy, 59.3% of patients were managed with active surveillance and 39.8% received adjuvant carboplatin. Six relapses were observed, corresponding to an overall relapse rate of 5.3%. All relapses occurred in patients initially managed with surveillance. Mean time to relapse was 17.2 months. Among the evaluated pathological factors, lymphovascular invasion showed the strongest association with relapse (Cramér’s V 0.30; p = 0.006), whereas the absolute number of events limited further multivariable analysis. Conclusions In this real-world cohort of clinical stage I seminoma, relapse rates were low and all recurrences occurred after surveillance, supporting the overall safety of a de-escalated post-orchiectomy strategy when combined with structured follow-up. Lymphovascular invasion emerged as a potential marker of relapse risk in this dataset, although the small number of events precludes definitive conclusions. These findings support individualized counselling and highlight the value of long-term real-world series to refine risk-adapted management in stage I seminoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gonzalez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: