Experimental study demonstrates enhanced end-to-end ore grade detection in graphite mineral sorting, indicating improved precision with minimal parameter overhead.
Graphite ore grade sorting is a key step toward intelligent mineral processing; however, it faces three representational contradictions: ambiguous classification posteriors at grade boundaries, asymmetric multi-scale feature interaction, and the mismatch between class-agnostic self-distillation assignment and sample-level difficulty. Targeting these, this paper adopts D-FINE as the baseline and introduces three decoupled improvements at its decoder, encoder, and criterion layers. (1) Boundary-Grade-aware Distribution Refinement (BG-FDR) online identifies boundary samples via the Top-2 classification score gap and modulates regression-distribution refinement, yielding +2.69 percentage points in mAP@0.5 with zero additional trainable parameters. (2) Bidirectional Feature Pyramid with Global–Local Spatial Attention (BiFPN-GLSA) builds a learnable weighted bidirectional multi-scale fusion path. (3) Difficulty-Aware Decoupled Distillation with Wise-Inner-Shape-IoU (DADD+Wise-IoU) imposes class- and sample-level difficulty-aware constraints. In the integrated full model, this increases Precision from 66.21% to 71.43% (+5.22 pp), F1 from 73.57% to 77.57%, and mean IoU from 97.81% to 98.35%, while false positives drop by 19.6%; the only parameter overhead (+3.84M) comes from BiFPN-GLSA, with BG-FDR and DADD adding effectively no network weights. Ablation on a self-built 3800-image dataset reveals a non-monotonic AP–Precision relationship: the mAP-optimal configuration (BG-FDR+BiFPN-GLSA, 94.17%) and the Precision-optimal one (DADD+Wise-IoU, 77.54%) do not coincide, providing a quantitative basis for objective-driven module selection in industrial sorting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: