Simulation study demonstrates superior cumulative rewards and robustness in battery energy management, indicating the efficacy of shared semantic representations across forecasting and control.
Modern energy systems, including those supporting transportation electrification, are increasingly exposed to volatile market conditions and external events. Effective decision-making therefore requires the integration of structured operational data with unstructured contextual information. Existing studies on Large Language Model (LLM)-assisted energy systems have mainly applied LLMs to individual tasks such as forecasting, scheduling, or decision support, while forecasting and control are typically treated separately. As a result, semantic information extracted from external events is not consistently propagated from market prediction to operational decision-making. This paper proposes a unified dual-stage framework in which the LLM functions as a shared semantic information processor, converting raw event data into structured representations used by both forecasting and control modules. In the forecasting stage, these representations improve price prediction under non-stationary conditions. In the control stage, the same information provides an event-aware contextual action prior for reinforcement learning-based energy management. This design allows external event information to inform both future-state estimation and subsequent control decisions, establishing a consistent connection between prediction and decision-making. The framework is evaluated using real-world electricity market data and a battery energy management environment. The results show that the proposed framework achieves the highest average cumulative reward among the evaluated methods while maintaining greater robustness than the forecasting-only LLM configuration. Overall, this work demonstrates the benefit of consistently propagating structured semantic information across forecasting and control and provides a viable approach to event-aware intelligent energy management, with potential extensions to multi-energy transportation systems and electrified mobility applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: