PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 23, 2026European Heart Journal - Digital HealthOpen Access

Artificial Intelligence Analysis of Continuous Wave Doppler Spectra to Detect Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Current AI solutions for LVEF assessment rely on 2D imaging and ECG signals, limiting utility when data quality is poor.

Does artificial intelligence analysis of continuous-wave Doppler spectra accurately detect reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (≤40%) in patients undergoing echocardiography?

Population

3,580 patients (3,988 examinations, 4,231 aortic CW Doppler recordings)

Comparison

AI analysis of aortic CW Doppler spectra to detect LVEF ≤40%

Design

Retrospective study

Key result

An AI model analyzing continuous-wave Doppler spectra detected left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% with 85.2% accuracy, 79.0% sensitivity, 86.7% specificity, and an AUC of 0.906.

Authors

EKEdyta Kaczmarska-DyrdaKSKarol SadowskiDWDamian Waląg

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

May enable LVEF assessment from limited Doppler data; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.

Key Points

  • To develop an artificial intelligence approach analyzing aortic valve continuous-wave Doppler spectra to identify reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (≤40%) without requiring 2D imaging or ECG gating.
  • Retrospectively analyzed 4,231 aortic continuous-wave Doppler recordings from 3,988 examinations across 3,580 patients, generating 13,359 single-peak spectral images.
  • Trained a CoAtNet-2 neural network on patient-level cohorts to classify single-peak Doppler images and averaged the output probabilities per examination.
  • Reduced ejection fraction (≤40%) occurred in 20.8% of examinations, associating with lower peak aortic valve velocity and higher mean pixel intensity.
  • In the held-out test cohort of 782 examinations, the model achieved an AUC of 0.906, 85.2% accuracy, 79.0% sensitivity, 86.7% specificity, 94.3% NPV, and 59.9% PPV.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=3,580)

Structured PICO

Does artificial intelligence analysis of continuous-wave Doppler spectra accurately detect reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (≤40%) in patients undergoing echocardiography?

P
Population
3,580 patients (3,988 examinations) evaluated retrospectively to develop and test an AI model for detecting reduced left ventricular ejection fraction from continuous-wave Doppler spectra.
E
Exposure
Artificial intelligence (CoAtNet-2 neural network) analysis of continuous-wave (CW) Doppler spectra from the aortic valve
O
Outcome
Detection of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤40%)surrogate

Main Result

Effect estimate: AUC 0.906

An AI model analyzing continuous-wave Doppler spectra from the aortic valve can accurately detect reduced LVEF (≤40%) without requiring 2D imaging or ECG gating.

Cite This Study

Kaczmarska-Dyrda et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (n=3,580). AI analysis of continuous-wave Doppler spectra was evaluated on Detection of LVEF ≤40% (AUC 0.906). An AI model analyzing continuous-wave Doppler spectra detected left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% with 85.2% accuracy, 79.0% sensitivity, 86.7% specificity, and an AUC of 0.906.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8aae407677a3411444730bhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztag137
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Noninvasive evaluation of left ventricular performance based on peak aortic blood acceleration measured with a continuous-wave Doppler velocity meter.1986 · 165 citations
  2. 2Assessing left ventricular systolic function: from ejection fraction to strain analysis2020 · 135 citations
  3. 3Deep learning for prediction of fractional flow reserve from resting coronary pressure curves2021 · 7 citations
  4. 4Average pixel intensity method for prediction of outcome in secondary mitral regurgitation2020 · 10 citations
  5. 5Myocardial Cut-off Sign is a Sensitive and Specific Cardiac Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sign to Distinguish Left Ventricular Pseudoaneurysms From True Aneurysms2020 · 20 citations