Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative interview analysis reveals pervasive tokenistic participation in ethnic tourism planning, suggesting structural paternalism and capacity deficits obstruct true community empowerment.
While Community-based tourism (CBT) is widely promoted as a means of indigenous empowerment, its implementation within centralized governance contexts often devolves into tokenism. This study deconstructs the “facade of participation” at Bau Truc pottery village (Vietnam), a UNESCO heritage site currently straining under the pressures of tourismification. Employing a rare insider perspective combined with 40 in-depth interviews, this research integrates Arnstein’s ladder with Tosun’s typology to map the prevailing power relations. The findings reveal a distinctly stratified structure: state agencies enforce “Coercive participation” through bureaucratic paternalism; local cooperatives operate under a mechanism of “Induced participation”; while residents are relegated to a “Passive” level. The article argues that this exclusion is driven not only by top-down mechanisms but is also legitimized by a “capacity deficit trap”—wherein the community lacks the necessary resources to exercise self-determination. Consequently, the study proposes a shift from a control-oriented model to a “Facilitated empowerment” framework, emphasizing the necessity of capacity building prior to the full transfer of power.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: