Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We assessed the 5-HT3-receptor antagonist effects of 4,5,6,7-1H-benzimidazole compounds which are derivatives of YM060, a potent and selective 5-HT3-receptor antagonist, in isolated guinea pig colon. YM114 (KAE-393), YM-26103-2, YM-26308-2 (3 x 10(-9) to 3 x 10(-8) M) produced concentration-dependent shifts to the right of the dose-response curves for both 5-HT and 2-methyl-5-HT (2-Me-5-HT). YM114 (pA2 = 9.08 against 5-HT, pA2 = 8.88 against 2-Me-5-HT), YM-26103-2 (pA2 = 8.27 against 5-HT, pA2 = 8.19 against 2-Me-5-HT), and YM-26308-2 (pA2 = 8.58 against 5-HT, pA2 = 8.4 against 2-Me-5-HT) showed similar pA2 values irrespective of the agonist used, suggesting that they have 5-HT3-receptor blocking activity irrespective of the N-position at the aromatic ring. Since these compounds have an asymmetric center, their enantiomers exist. The S-isomers were one to three orders of magnitude less potent than the respective R-isomer compounds, indicating that the stereochemical configuration of 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-benzimidazoles is an important determinant of their affinity for 5-HT3 receptors. These results suggest that the highly potent 5-HT3 receptor antagonism and high selectivity for 5-HT3 receptors of 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-benzimidazole derivatives are conserved irrespective of the position of the nitrogen atom in the aromatic ring and that 5-HT3 receptors favor the R-isometric conformation of these compounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamato et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: