Key result
CV11974 significantly reduced infarct size as a percentage of the area at risk compared to control (25.49% vs 68.58%, p<0.01) in dogs following myocardial ischemia-reperfusion.
Why the study?
Does AT1-receptor antagonist CV11974 reduce infarct size and improve adjacent regional function after ischemia-reperfusion in dogs?
Does AT1-receptor antagonist CV11974 reduce infarct size and improve adjacent regional function after ischemia-reperfusion in dogs?
The AT1-receptor antagonist CV11974 reduces infarct size after ischemia-reperfusion in dogs, though this effect is not related to changes in regional myocardial function at the adjacent region.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reduces infarct size in canine ischemia-reperfusion; extends preclinical data but leaves open human applicability.
The presence of nonischemic regional dysfunction at the adjacent region of the ischemic myocardium was demonstrated in clinical studies. Recent studies demonstrated an angiotensin II type 1 (AT1)-receptor antagonist reduced myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. We investigated the role of the adjacent region after reperfusion by studying the effects of AT1-receptor antagonist on myocardial function and infarct size. We investigated 12 open-chest anesthetized dogs undergoing 90 min of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion followed by 4 h of reperfusion. Six dogs injected with an AT1-receptor antagonist (CV11974) immediately after reperfusion were compared with 6 control dogs. Percent systolic shortening (%SS) was measured by two sets of the pair sonomicrometer crystals implanted to adjacent and remote nonischemic myocardium. After 4 h of reperfusion, infarct size was measured. There were no significant differences of the %SS at baseline between two regions. In both groups, %SS at adjacent region after reperfusion was significantly decreased as compared with remote region. There were no significant differences between the two groups. Infarct size, as a percentage of the area at risk, was smaller in the AT, group than in control group (25.49+/-7.53% vs 68.58+/-26.88% P<0.01). AT1-receptor antagonist reduces infarct size. This effect is not related to the change of regional myocardial function at adjacent region after reperfusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyoshi et al. (2002) studied Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (n=12). CV11974 (AT1-receptor antagonist) vs. Control (no injection) was evaluated on Infarct size as a percentage of the area at risk (p=<0.01). CV11974 significantly reduced infarct size as a percentage of the area at risk compared to control (25.49% vs 68.58%, p<0.01) in dogs following myocardial ischemia-reperfusion.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: