Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: BM4 is a novel genetically engineered variant of the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 that lacks the typical Bet v 1-like fold and displays negligible IgE-binding but strong T cell-activating capacity. The aim of this study was to elucidate possible differences between BM4 and Bet v 1 in internalization, antigen processing, and presentation. METHODS: Proliferative responses to BM4 and Bet v 1 of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and Bet v 1-specific T-cell clones were compared. Fluorescently labeled BM4 and Bet v 1 were used to study surface binding, endocytosis, and intracellular degradation by monocyte-derived DC (mdDC). Both proteins were digested by endolysosomal extracts of mdDC. BM4- and Bet v 1-pulsed mdDC were employed to assess the kinetics of activation of Bet v 1-specific T-cell clones and the polarization of naïve T cells. RESULTS: BM4 displayed a significantly stronger T cell-activating capacity than Bet v 1. Furthermore, BM4 showed increased surface binding and internalization as well as faster endolysosomal degradation compared with Bet v 1. BM4-pulsed mdDC induced enhanced proliferative responses at earlier time-points in Bet v 1-specific T-cell clones and promoted less IL-5 production in T cells than Bet v 1-pulsed mdDC. CONCLUSION: The loss of the Bet v 1-fold changes the protein's interaction with the human immune system at the level of antigen-presenting cells resulting in altered T-cell responses. By combining low IgE-binding with strong and modulating T cell-activating capacity, BM4 represents a highly interesting candidate for specific immunotherapy of birch pollen allergy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitzmüller et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: