Key result
ARB therapy linked to ~2.1-fold higher cardiovascular risk vs ACEIs in elderly hypertensive males.
Why the study?
Do angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) compared to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) improve cardiovascular and cerebrovascular outcomes in aged male patients with hypertension?
Cohort (n=933)
No
Do angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) compared to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) improve cardiovascular and cerebrovascular outcomes in aged male patients with hypertension?
In aged male hypertensive patients, ACEI therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events compared to ARB therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change prescribing in elderly hypertensive men; leaves open confounding and needs randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Although angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are equally important in the treatment of hypertension, there is less evidence whether they have equal cardiovascular and cerebrovascular protective effects, especially in elder hypertensive patients. This study aims to clarify this unresolved issue. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included clinical data on 933 aged male patients with hypertension who received either an ARB or ACEI for more than two months between January 2007 and May 2011. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke. The secondary endpoints were unstable angina, new atrial fibrillation, and transient ischemic attack. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 24 months. Age, drug types, cerebral infarction history, renal dysfunction history were the independent predictors of the primary endpoint. The risk of an occurrence of a primary endpoint event was higher in the ARB group than the ACEI group [P = 0.037, hazard ratios (HR): 2.124, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.048-4.306]. The Kaplan-Meier method also suggests that the rate of primary endpoint occurrence was higher in the ARB group than the ACEI group (P = 0.04). In regard to the secondary endpoints, there were no significant differences between the two treatment arms (P = 0.137, HR: 1.454, 95% CI: 0.888-2.380). Patient age and coronary heart disease history were independent predictors of the secondary endpoint. CONCLUSION: ACEI were more effective than ARB in reducing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality in aged patients with hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (n=933). Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) vs. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke (HR 2.124, 95% CI 1.048-4.306, p=0.037). ARB therapy was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke compared to ACEI therapy in elderly male hypertensive patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: