Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have investigated the magnetic properties of bulk amorphous Pd40Ni40−xFexP20 (x=0–17.5) alloys. For Pd40Ni40P20 (x=0), the magnetic susceptibility consists of temperature-independent and Curie–Weiss-type terms. Alloys with x⩾5 are paramagnetic at high temperatures. With decreasing temperature, the amorphous alloys become superparamagnetic. At even lower temperatures, and under a weak applied magnetic field, these alloys are spin glasses, as evidenced by static and dynamic magnetic measurements. The spin-freezing temperature increases with increasing iron content and this is attributed to the role of the Ruderman–Kittel–Kasuya–Yosida interaction in creating the spin-glass state. The occurrence of a reentrant spin-glass behavior on cooling (superparamagnetism-to-ferromagnetism-to-spin-glass transition) is also observed for x=17.5 at a field ⩾50 Oe. An unexpected result is that the ferromagnetic state in the present bulk metallic glasses is field induced. Evidence for the field-induced ferromagnetic-like order is obtained from (a) straight regions in the susceptibility versus temperature curves measured at various fields, (b) an Arrott plot, and (c) time-independent magnetization. With increasing applied field, the spin-freezing temperature decreases and the Curie temperature increases, broadening the temperature range of the field-induced ferromagnetic-like state. The temporal decay of the thermoremanent magnetization in the amorphous alloy with x=17.5 is slower than that in typical crystalline spin glasses. The spin-freezing temperature of the amorphous alloy with x=17.5 decreases approximately logarithmically with applied field, which differs from the prediction of Néel’s model for spin glasses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: