Key result
Directly acting oral anticoagulants offer a safe and effective alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, with specific agents preferred based on comorbidities.
Why the study?
Patients with atrial fibrillation face high stroke and mortality risks, creating the challenge of selecting an appropriate oral anticoagulant tailored to individual risk factors and comorbidities.
Do directly acting oral anticoagulants reduce stroke and systemic embolism compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Do directly acting oral anticoagulants reduce stroke and systemic embolism compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The choice of a specific directly acting oral anticoagulant in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation should be individualized based on age, renal function, bleeding risk, and concomitant cardiovascular diseases.
Patients with atrial fibrillation have a high risk of developing stroke and death, which requires constant anticoagulant support. In this regard, the physician faces the difficult task of selecting the appropriate oral anticoagulant for patient with individual risk factors and comorbidities. Currently, three non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants or directly acting oral anticoagulants have been registered in the Russia, which in large randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were compared with warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. The present article analyzes the data of RCTs, postmarketing studies of oral anticoagulants, and presents groups of patients for whom these drugs are preferred. The choice of oral anticoagulants for the prevention of stroke in the following subgroups of patients with atrial fibrillation is discussed: patients with one stroke risk factor (CHA2DS2VASc1 in men or 2 in women), patients of different age groups, patients with concomitant coronary artery disease/acute coronary syndrome, a history of stroke, patients with chronic kidney disease, patients with a high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, and a group of patients with concomitant arterial hypertension and chronic heart failure. We compared the efficacy and safety of oral non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants or directly acting oral anticoagulants with vitamin K antagonists in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kryukov et al. (2019) conducted a review in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Directly acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Warfarin was evaluated. Directly acting oral anticoagulants offer a safe and effective alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, with specific agents preferred based on comorbidities.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: