Animal migrations and movement patterns are fundamental drivers that govern the dynamics of marine populations. Movement often varies across demographic attributes and through time in response to biology and environmental forcing, giving rise to a spectrum of connectivity patterns and resultant population structures. For commercially exploited marine fisheries, stock assessment models are widely used to estimate population status and provide sustainable harvest advice, typically assuming a spatially homogeneous panmictic population and ignoring movement. Spatially stratified stock assessment models can integrate population and spatial structure, as well as model movement, but their adoption is limited due to increased complexity and difficulties estimating movement. We introduce a parsimonious approach for representing movement using continuous-time Markov chains (CTMC). The theoretical basis for deriving diffusive and taxis-based movement from a CTMC process is provided, then a simulation-estimation experiment is undertaken that simulates age-, time-, and environmentally driven movement rates to demonstrate the utility of the CTMC movement framework within spatially stratified stock assessment models. A case study based on a three-region model of Alaska sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria) illustrates how the CTMC framework can be utilized in a real-world assessment and data context. Across simulation experiments, the CTMC movement model produced minimal bias and accurately represented complex movement. The sablefish CTMC application revealed age-varying movement dynamics, resulting in improved model fits relative to other movement parameterizations (i.e. an unstructured Markov approach with constant or age-varying movement). Overall, results support broader integration of CTMC-based movement models into assessment platforms, which could help reduce implementation barriers for spatially stratified stock assessments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: