Key result
Transcatheter closure of postinfarct ventricular septal defects is a viable alternative to surgical repair, with series reporting 32% mortality compared to 30-50% for surgical all-comers.
Why the study?
Does transcatheter closure improve survival in patients with postinfarct ventricular septal defects?
Does transcatheter closure improve survival in patients with postinfarct ventricular septal defects?
Transcatheter closure is a viable, durable alternative to surgical repair for postinfarct VSDs, with decisions best guided by a multidisciplinary heart team.
Should not yet change practice for postinfarct VSD; leaves open need for RCTs vs surgery.
Postinfarct ventricular septal defects (VSDs) are a mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with a very poor prognosis. They are estimated to occur in 0.2% of patients presenting with AMI, with 1-month survival of 6% without intervention. Guidelines recommend surgical repair, but recent advances in transcatheter technology, and bespoke device development, mean it is increasingly viable as a closure option. Surgical mortality is between 30% and 50% for all-comers, while in series of transcatheter closure, mortality was 32%. Transcatheter closure appears durable, with no evidence of late leaks and low long-term mortality in series with up to 5-year follow-up. Guidelines recommend early closure, which is likely to provide most benefit for patients regardless of the closure method. Multimodality cardiac imaging including echocardiography, CT and cardiac MRI can define size, shape, location of defects and their relationship to other cardiac structures, assisting with treatment decisions. Brief delay to allow stabilisation of the patient is appropriate, but untreated patients risk rapid deterioration. Mechanical circulatory support may be helpful, although the preferred modality is unclear. Transcatheter closure involves large bore venous access and the formation of an arteriovenous loop (under fluoroscopic and trans-oesophageal echocardiographic guidance) in order to facilitate deployment of the device in the defect and close the postinfarct VSD. Guidelines suggest transcatheter closure as an alternative to surgical repair in centres where appropriate expertise exists, but decisions for all patients with postinfarct VSD should be led by the multidisciplinary heart team.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giblett et al. (2020) conducted a review in Postinfarct ventricular septal defects. Transcatheter closure vs. Surgical repair was evaluated on Mortality. Transcatheter closure of postinfarct ventricular septal defects is a viable alternative to surgical repair, with series reporting 32% mortality compared to 30-50% for surgical all-comers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: